Legal help, services and support for private residential landlords
Tenancy deposits and tenancy deposit protection is a subject which has caused a few headaches over the years. But before we look a tenancy deposits, lets take a quick look at holding deposits.
This is where you take a sum of money to ‘hold’ the property for an applicant.
Holding deposits are now regulated by the Tenant Fees Act , and the following rules apply:
Once the 15 day (or agreed extension time) is over the money must either be returned to the applicant or, if the following conditions apply, the money can be withheld:
You must tell the applicant in writing if you withhold the money and say why.
Landlord Law members will find a more detailed guide here and draft letters and a receipt form (which provides for the 15 day period to be extended). Non members can read about this in our blog post.
The rules are very similar in Wales, save that Welsh landlords need to provide additional information.
Lets now turn to tenancy deposits.
It is generally considered essential that landlords take a deposit from a tenant at the start of the tenancy. This is used as a fund for you to use at the end of the tenancy, if the tenant leaves owing money – either to put right problems with the property such as damage or cleaning, or to cover unpaid rent.
There are alternatives –
However, with a guarantee, you have to chase the guarantor (or make a claim if you are using an ‘alternative scheme’)– you do not have the money there when you need it.
The alternative schemes can be good, but some landlords have complained about the administration involved in claiming for payment and there can be hidden fees
Insurance policies will generally only cover tenancies where the tenants satisfy strict referencing. These are not the ones likely to be causing the problems!
Although landlords often moan about them, nothing really seems to be as satisfactory as taking a deposit, and the prospect of losing their deposit motivates tenants to keep the property in a good condition and leave it clean and tidy when they go.
Prior to 2007, sadly, many landlords abused their position with deposits, often it seemed with impunity.
Legally, a deposit is the tenant’s money, and they are entitled to its return unless there is a genuine claim. However, many landlords (not all but a substantial minority) tended just to pocket the money and refuse to return it.
After numerous complaints about this and campaigns by tenant organisations, regulations for a tenancy deposit scheme were introduced by the government in the Housing Act 2004.
Unfortunately, the legislation was not well drafted, and there have been two amendments, once in 2012 and once in 2015.
The 2019 Tenant Fees legislation then limited the amount of money that could be taken for a deposit (in England) to 5 weeks’ worth of rent (or 6 weeks’ worth of rent if the annual rent was over £50,000).
It is important that no more than this is taken (even by a penny) as otherwise this is an offence.
We have a calculator that can be used to calculate the correct sum, which you will find below.
This came into force in April 2007 and was then amended in 2012 and again in 2015. It currently only affects tenancies let on an assured shorthold tenancy (or under an occupation contract in Wales) – however, this is the majority of lets in the private sector today.
After 1 May 2026, when the Renters Rights Act abolishes assured shorthold tenancies, the same rules will apply to assured tenancies.
The rules provide for the landlord to
Both are necessary. See below for the penalties which apply if this is not done.
There are two kinds of deposit schemes
These are free to use, but you need to pay the money over to the scheme administrators who hold it for the duration of the tenancy. The scheme gets its fee from the interest earned on the deposits held.
Custodial schemes have many advantages. For example
The disadvantage of the scheme is that it takes several days, and sometimes much longer if one of the parties is unavailable, for the money to be released.
This is where the money is held by the landlord or letting agent. However, the landlord or agent has to pay a fee to the scheme. This covers the scheme costs if the landlord or agent loses the money and they have to make good to the tenants.
One big reason why landlords often prefer the insurance based schemes is that it allows them to refund the deposit money immediately to tenants without having to go through the procedure of claiming this from the scheme.
Tenants like this as they generally need the deposit to use for their next property.
There are three companies who are authorised by the government to run tenancy deposit schemes:
The Deposit Protection Service (DPS)
Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS)
My Deposits
They are all much of a muchness, and all offer both custodial and insurance based schemes.
All landlords (or agents where agents deal with the deposit) must, in addition to protecting the deposit, serve ‘prescribed information’ on the tenants. Or, if the deposit money was paid to the landlord or agent by someone else, the prescribed information must be served on them, too.
Note that it is the information which is prescribed. There is currently no prescribed form, although it looks as if a prescribed form will be published on or shortly before 1 May 2026.
Most of the deposit schemes will provide a form, and if so, this is the form that you should use. Note that serving a copy of the deposit certificate and the scheme rules leaflet will not cover all the prescribed information required, so if your scheme does not provide a form, you should use one obtained elsewhere.
We have a Landlord Law form with versions for both England and Wales.
Note, there was a case in 2012 where a tenant challenged the landlord’s right to possession under section 21 as he had not provided all the prescribed information. The landlord said that this was not necessary as the information was freely available on the internet! The Judges disagreed, though, and he lost his claim.
Keep proof of service of the prescribed information, just in case this is challenged later.
If you are renting property through a limited company or are an agent operating through a limited company, you should read this article.
Often, at the end of a tenancy, there are disagreements, with the landlord wanting compensation for damage and the tenants objecting to this.
Landlords and agents should try to resolve this themselves, but this is not always possible. For this situation, all three deposit schemes provide a free adjudication service.
Full details of the adjudication schemes can be found on the scheme websites (which are very informative), but here are a few tips.
It is important to remember when bringing a claim, that the starting point is always that it is the tenant’s money. So, the burden of proving that the deduction is reasonable rests on you, the landlord. The tenant does not have to prove anything.
As with all legal claims, you have to prove two things:
1. Liability – ie that the tenant is actually liable for the sum claimed. For example tenants will not be liable for ‘fair wear and tear’ – ie the ordinary damage that can be expected when a property is being lived in.
2. Quantum – this is the amount of money you are claiming. This has to be reasonable and relate to the actual loss suffered by the landlord. So for example you cannot get ‘new lamps for old’. If items were not new, the sum that can be claimed will be reduced accordingly.
It also means that you can’t just say ‘the tenant left the property in a disgusting stage so I should be entitled to all the deposit’. You need to give details to the adjudicator and prove your case.
The adjudicators all deal with cases on a paperwork basis only and do not visit the properties. It is essential, therefore, that full evidence is provided by landlords to support their claim.
Landlords often complain that adjudicators favour tenants, but adverse decisions are frequently made because inadequate evidence has been provided to support a landlord’s claim.
Remember that adjudicators do not have second sight! You have to prove your claim by providing sufficient evidence.
The evidence you provide should include:
Further information and helpful guides regarding adjudication are available on all three of the schemes’ websites.
On the whole, the schemes have worked well, and thousands of deposits have been protected safely. However, many landlords still do fail to protect.
The main penalties are:
Unfortunately, the original penalty rules failed to operate as expected and it has been necessary to amend them twice. The rules currently apply as follows:
After 1 May 2026, when the Renters Rights Act comes into force, and section 21 is abolished, the prohibition on eviction will instead apply to all section 8 claims apart from claims based on grounds 7A or 14 (which relate to anti-social behaviour). The Housing Act 2004 will be amended accordingly.
It looks as if late protection of the deposit will no longer prevent a possession order from being made.
Because the law has had to be changed twice, the following rules apply to older deposits:
These deposits do not need to be protected and the prescribed information does not need to be served, unless the landlord wants to use section 21 (or after 1 May 2026 any of the section 8 grounds apart from grounds 7A and 14). In this case, this needs to be done before any notice is served.
These were the subject of a case, the Superstrike case, in 2013, which showed up another problem with the legislation. As a result of this all landlords in this situation were given until 23 June 2015 to protect the deposit and serve the prescribed information.
These should have been protected and prescribed information served by 6 May 2012 (under the provisions of the Localism Act 2012).
These must have been protected and the prescribed information served with in 30 days of payment of the money (ie not the start of the tenancy).
Note also that landlords who properly protect the deposit and serve the prescribed information during the initial fixed term, do not have to re-serve the prescribed information again in any subsequent tenancies, provided there is no change in the parties or the property let. This will not apply after 1 May 2026 as the Renters Rights Act will abolish fixed terms.
Landlord Law members can check compliance with our tenancy deposit compliance checker.
These are also known as ‘deposit replacement schemes’.
They are initially more affordable for tenants as they will only have to find a modest fee, normally one week’s worth of rent, as opposed to a month to five weeks’ worth of rent, as is normal with traditional deposit schemes.
However, the fee is not refundable (whereas tenants get all of their deposit back if landlords do not make a claim), and these schemes can prove more expensive for tenants if a large claim is made.
Landlords need to be aware that this is actually a guarantee scheme, not a deposit or insurance service. So you need to be sure that the company will be good to pay any claims when the tenant vacates – which could be many years away.
Here are a few more points about alternative schemes:
Landlord Law members can find out more about alternative schemes here.
Here is some extra reading for you from our Blogs:
Tenancy deposits for rented properties with ‘disorganised comings and goings’
Tenancy Deposit protection and points from the Khuja v Chowdhury case
Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. Old – good news for landlords
Signing Legal Documents and the Northwood Solihull v. Fearn Appeal
Landlord Law members can check compliance with our tenancy deposit compliance checker. Non-members will find this quick guide helpful.
However if you are using a traditional deposit, you will find a huge amount of information on your scheme website, plus all three schemes provide a free telephone helpline.
In the next part of this course, we will look at rent.
About the issues raised in this article:
A company registered in England & Wales number 08153069.
R/O 148 Unthank Road, Norwich Norfolk NR2 2RS.
Tel: 01603 763096
Registered for VAT No 140 5971 19.

Property Investors Bureau.
Associated website: